Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 47
Filter
1.
Int Heart J ; 64(3): 344-351, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235285

ABSTRACT

Although there is no sign of reinfection, individuals who have a history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may experience prolonged chest discomfort and shortness of breath on exertion. This study aimed to examine the relationship between atherosclerotic coronary plaque structure and COVID-19. This retrospective cohort comprised 1269 consecutive patients who had coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) between July 2020 and April 2021. The type of atherosclerotic plaque was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the severity of coronary stenosis as determined via the Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification and the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. To reveal the relationship between the history of COVID-19 and the extent and severity of CAD, propensity score analysis and further multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed. The median age of the study population was 52 years, with 53.5% being male. COVID-19 was present in 337 individuals. The median duration from COVID-19 diagnosis to CCTA extraction was 245 days. The presence of atherosclerotic soft plaque (OR: 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-3.11, P = 0.001), mixed plaque (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.39-4.43, P = 0.001), and high-risk plaque (OR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.98-3.84, P < 0.001) was shown to be linked with the history of COVID-19 on the conditional multivariate regression analysis of the propensity-matched population. However, no statistically significant association was found between the history of COVID-19 and the severity of coronary stenosis based on CAD-RADS and CAC score. We found that the history of COVID-19 might be associated with coronary atherosclerosis assessed via CCTA.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Stenosis , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/complications , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Coronary Angiography/methods , COVID-19 Testing , Risk Factors , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/epidemiology , Coronary Stenosis/complications , Computed Tomography Angiography , Predictive Value of Tests
2.
Curr Atheroscler Rep ; 25(7): 351-357, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2317609

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) being the most used nuclear imaging technique for diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), many now consider positron emission tomography (PET) as a superior modality. This review will focus on the advances of cardiac PET in recent years and its advantages compared to SPECT in diagnosis and prognosis of CAD. RECENT FINDINGS: PET's higher resolution and enhanced diagnostic accuracy, as well as lower radiation exposure, all help explain the rationale for its wider spread and use. PET also allows for measurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR), which aids in several different clinical scenarios, such as diagnosing multivessel disease or identifying non-responders. PET has also been shown to be useful in diagnosing CAD in various specific populations, such as patients with prior COVID-19 infection, cardiac transplant, and other comorbidities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Myocardial Ischemia , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , Humans , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Angiography/methods , Prognosis , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial/physiology , COVID-19 Testing
3.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 24(Suppl 1): e67-e76, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315036

ABSTRACT

There is increasing evidence that in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) under optimal medical therapy, a persisting dysregulation of the lipid and glucose metabolism, associated with adipose tissue dysfunction and inflammation, predicts a substantial residual risk of disease progression and cardiovascular events. Despite the inflammatory nature of ASCVD, circulating biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukins may lack specificity for vascular inflammation. As known, dysfunctional epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) produce pro-inflammatory mediators and promote cellular tissue infiltration triggering further pro-inflammatory mechanisms. The consequent tissue modifications determine the attenuation of PCAT as assessed and measured by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Recently, relevant studies have demonstrated a correlation between EAT and PCAT and obstructive coronary artery disease, inflammatory plaque status and coronary flow reserve (CFR). In parallel, CFR is well recognized as a marker of coronary vasomotor function that incorporates the haemodynamic effects of epicardial, diffuse and small-vessel disease on myocardial tissue perfusion. An inverse relationship between EAT volume and coronary vascular function and the association of PCAT attenuation and impaired CFR have already been reported. Moreover, many studies demonstrated that 18F-FDG PET is able to detect PCAT inflammation in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. Importantly, the perivascular FAI (fat attenuation index) showed incremental value for the prediction of adverse clinical events beyond traditional risk factors and CCTA indices by providing a quantitative measure of coronary inflammation. As an indicator of increased cardiac mortality, it could guide early targeted primary prevention in a wide spectrum of patients. In this review, we summarize the current evidence regarding the clinical applications and perspectives of EAT and PCAT assessment performed by CCTA and the prognostic information derived by nuclear medicine.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Nuclear Medicine , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Humans , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Adipose Tissue , Inflammation/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(8)2023 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2299758

ABSTRACT

Inflammation is a key factor in the development of atherosclerosis, a disease characterized by the buildup of plaque in the arteries. COVID-19 infection is known to cause systemic inflammation, but its impact on local plaque vulnerability is unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 infection on coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for chest pain in the early stages after infection, using an AI-powered solution called CaRi-Heart®. The study included 158 patients (mean age was 61.63 ± 10.14 years) with angina and low to intermediate clinical likelihood of CAD, with 75 having a previous COVID-19 infection and 83 without infection. The results showed that patients who had a previous COVID-19 infection had higher levels of pericoronary inflammation than those who did not have a COVID-19 infection, suggesting that COVID-19 may increase the risk of coronary plaque destabilization. This study highlights the potential long-term impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular health, and the importance of monitoring and managing cardiovascular risk factors in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. The AI-powered CaRi-Heart® technology may offer a non-invasive way to detect coronary artery inflammation and plaque instability in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Coronary Angiography/methods , Adipose Tissue , COVID-19/complications , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/etiology , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Inflammation/complications , Coronary Vessels
5.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(5): 2173-2181, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270288

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 pneumonia, caused by the virus Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared a pandemic by the WHO on 11th March 2020. While Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) represents the diagnostic gold standard of infection, computed tomography (CT) has been shown to have an important role in supporting the diagnosis, quantifying the severity, and assessing the efficacy of treatment and its response. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is a CT finding that estimates atherosclerosis and can be quantified using the coronary artery calcium score (CACS). The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the correlation between coronary artery calcification and mortality rate in COVID-19 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventeen (317) hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were ruled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a non-ECG-gated chest CT to evaluate lung parenchymal involvement. In the same cohort, we observed the two main coronary arteries (common trunk, circumflex, anterior interventricular and right coronary heart) using a visual score, so patients were divided into four groups based on Ordinal CAC Score (OCS) levels. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis proved that the OCS value was statistically correlated with the mortality rate (p < 0.001). In fact, in the group of patients with an OCS value of 0, the mortality rate was 10.1% (10/99 patients), in the group with OCS between 1 and 4 was 18.9% (21/111), in the OCS group of patients ranged from 5 to 8 was 30.4% (24/79) and in the OCS group between 9 and 12 was 46.4% (13/28). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that calcific atheromasia of the coronary arteries in patients with COVID-19 can be considered a prognostic marker of clinical outcome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Vascular Calcification , Humans , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging
6.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 23(1): 78, 2023 02 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2238645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is a frequent complication caused by cardiac and non-cardiac pathophysiological mechanisms, but often it is subclinical. MINS is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, justifying the need to its diagnose and the investigation of their causes for its potential prevention. METHODS: Prospective, observational, pilot study, aiming to detect MINS, its relationship with silent coronary artery disease and its effect on future adverse outcomes in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery and without postoperative signs or symptoms of myocardial ischemia. MINS was defined by a high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration > 14 ng/L at 48-72 h after surgery and exceeding by 50% the preoperative value; controls were the operated patients without MINS. Within 1-month after discharge, cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed in MINS and control subjects. Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined by a CAD-RADS category ≥ 3. The primary outcomes were prevalence of CAD among MINS and controls and incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1-year after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of individual MACE components and mortality. RESULTS: We included 52 MINS and 12 controls. The small number of included patients could be attributed to the study design complexity and the dates of later follow-ups (amid COVID-19 waves). Significant CAD by CCTA was equally found in 20 MINS and controls (30% vs 33%, respectively). Ischemic patterns (n = 5) and ischemic segments (n = 2) depicted by cardiac MRI were only observed in patients with MINS. One-year MACE were also only observed in MINS patients (15.4%). CONCLUSION: This study with advanced imaging methods found a similar CAD frequency in MINS and control patients, but that cardiac ischemic findings by MRI and worse prognosis were only observed in MINS patients. Our results, obtained in a pilot study, suggest the need of further, extended studies that screened systematically MINS and evaluated its relationship with cardiac ischemia and poor outcomes. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03438448 (19/02/2018).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Injuries , Myocardial Ischemia , Humans , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors
7.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 80(17): 1617-1628, 2022 10 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2239858

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) causes impaired blood flow in both epicardial coronary arteries and the microvasculature. A leading cause of post-transplant mortality, CAV affects 50% of heart transplant recipients within 10 years of heart transplant. OBJECTIVES: This analysis examined the outcomes of heart transplant recipients with reduced myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR) and microvascular CAV detected by 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging. METHODS: A total of 181 heart transplant recipients who underwent PET to assess for CAV were included with a median follow-up of 4.7 years. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the total MBFR: >2.0 and ≤2.0. Microvascular CAV was defined as no epicardial CAV detected by PET and/or coronary angiography, but with an MBFR ≤2.0 by PET. RESULTS: In total, 71 (39%) patients had an MBFR ≤2.0. Patients with an MBFR ≤2.0 experienced an increased risk for all outcomes: 7-fold increase in death or retransplantation (HR: 7.05; 95% CI: 3.2-15.6; P < 0.0001), 12-fold increase in cardiovascular death (HR: 12.0; 95% CI: 2.64-54.12; P = 0.001), and 10-fold increase in cardiovascular hospitalization (HR: 10.1; 95% CI: 3.43-29.9; P < 0.0001). The 5-year mean survival was 302 days less than those with an MBFR >2.0 (95% CI: 260.2-345.4 days; P < 0.0001). Microvascular CAV (adjusted HR: 3.86; 95% CI: 1.58-9.40; P = 0.003) was independently associated with an increased risk of death or retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal myocardial blood flow reserve, even in the absence of epicardial CAV, identifies patients at a high risk of death or retransplantation. Measures of myocardial blood flow provide prognostic information in addition to traditional CAV assessment.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Transplantation , Humans , Prognosis , Ammonia , Coronary Angiography/methods , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Heart Transplantation/methods , Allografts/physiology , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery
8.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 11(20): e025844, 2022 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2079124

ABSTRACT

Background Cardiovascular complications from COVID-19 contribute to its high morbidity and mortality. The effect of COVID-19 infection on the coronary vasculature is not known. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of coronary vasomotor dysfunction identified by coronary flow reserve from cardiac positron emission tomography in patients with previous COVID-19 infection. Methods and Results All patients who had polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection referred for myocardial stress perfusion positron emission tomography imaging at Brigham and Women's Hospital from April 2020 to July 2021 were compared with a matched control group without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection imaged in the same period. The main outcome was the prevalence of coronary vasomotor dysfunction. Myocardial perfusion and myocardial blood flow reserve were quantified using N13-ammonia positron emission tomography imaging. Thirty-four patients with prior COVID-19 were identified and compared with 103 matched controls. The median time from polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 to cardiac positron emission tomography was 4.6 months (interquartile range,1.2-5.6 months). There were 16 out of 34 (47%) patients previously hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. Baseline cardiac risk factors were common, and 18 (53%) patients in the COVID-19 group had abnormal myocardial perfusion. Myocardial blood flow reserve was abnormal (<2) in 44.0% of the patients with COVID-19 compared with 11.7% of matched controls (P<0.001). The mean myocardial blood flow reserve was 19.4% lower in patients with COVID-19 compared with control patients (2.00±0.45 versus 2.48±0.47, P<0.001). Conclusions Myocardial blood flow reserve was impaired in patients with prior COVID-19 infection compared with cardiovascular risk factor-matched controls, suggesting a relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and coronary vascular health. These data highlight the need to assess long-term consequences of COVID-19 on vascular health in future prospective studies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiomyopathies , Coronary Artery Disease , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , Humans , Female , Coronary Circulation/physiology , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Ammonia/pharmacology , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology
9.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 15209, 2022 09 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2028727

ABSTRACT

Opium is one of the most abused substances in the Middle East. The effects of opium use on coronary artery disease (CAD) are a matter of debate. This study aimed to assess the association between opium use and angiographic findings as well as the complexity of CAD in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis. In this case-control study, all patients admitted for coronary angiography from 2019 to 2020 were evaluated. After applying the eligibility criteria, they were categorized into two groups opium and non-opium based on their history of opium use. Both groups were matched regarding the demographic features. The prevalence, location, and severity of obstruction of the vessels were compared between the non-opium and opium groups. The SYNTAX score was also calculated and compared between the two groups. The scores ≤ 22 are considered low risk and the higher scores are a non-low risk. P value < 0.05 is considered significant. A total of 170 patients with a mean age of 61.59 ± 9.07 years were finally enrolled in our study. Regarding the severity of vascular involvement, there was a significant difference between the non-opium and opium groups in LAD (P = 0.025), and PLV (P = 0.018) vessels. From the location points of view of obstructive coronary artery involved segments, only in the PDA (P = 0.006), and LCX (P = 0.004) vessels, a significant difference was observed. Moreover, 47.1% of opium and 30.6% of non-opium use group were in the non-low risk SYNTAX score classification which is a statistically significant difference between these two groups (P value = 0.048). Opium, as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, can have specific effects on angiographic findings in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Likewise, the complexity of CAD in opium users who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention is significantly higher.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Coronary Artery Disease , Opium Dependence , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Acute Coronary Syndrome/etiology , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Opium/adverse effects , Opium Dependence/diagnostic imaging , Opium Dependence/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index
10.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 40S: 182-183, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2007575

ABSTRACT

Translesional coronary pressure measures the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery disease. Angiographic-physiologic mismatching is attributed mainly to imaging limitations. We present a patient with extreme visual-physiologic functional mismatch and a markedly elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) as a potential contributory mechanism.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Hemodynamics , Angiography , Blood Pressure , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Humans
11.
Open Heart ; 9(2)2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1993078

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe atherosclerosis have been found to exhibit considerable changes in blood pressure (BP) between arms. The objective of our study was to investigate the predictive value of interarm blood pressure difference (IABPD) for coronary artery disease (CAD) severity. METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Cardiology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram from May 2020 to November 2020. The study conveniently selected 110 individuals who visited the department for a coronary angiography during the study period. The BP of both arms were synchronously measured 1-2 days before the coronary angiography and IABPD were calculated. After coronary angiography, two blinded interventional cardiologists visually estimated the amount of coronary artery obstruction and determined the Gensini score. RESULTS: Among the participants, more than three-fourths of the patients were above 50 years of age (64.66%), and the majority were male (86.67%). 14.7% of participants had no occlusion in their coronary artery, 38.0% of participants had insignificant occlusion, 26.7% participants had mild occlusion, 10.3% participants had moderate occlusion, 3.3% participants had significant occlusion and 6.0% participants had total occlusion. Corrected pulse IABPD (cIABPDpulse) showed the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.73) for predicting a high Gensini score (>median). Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between corrected systolic IABPD (cIABPDsys) and the Gensini score (B=0.057, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The differences in BP between the arms were found to be having a strong positive correlation with CAD severity.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Bangladesh , Blood Pressure , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors
12.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 23(8): 535-545, 2022 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1974564

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The prevalence and prognostic implications of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients infected by the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease remain unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence and mortality risk in COVID-19 patients with preexisting CAD. We searched Medline and Scopus to locate all articles published up to December 8, 2021, reporting data of COVID-19 survivors and nonsurvivors with preexisting CAD. Data were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random effects models with odds ratio (OR) as the effect measure with the related 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies including 27 435 patients (mean age 61.5 and 70.9 years) were analysed. The pooled prevalence of preexisting CAD was 12.6% (95% CI: 11.2-16.5%, I2 : 95.6%), and resulted as higher in intensive care unit patients (17.5%, 95% CI: 11.9-25.1, I2 : 88.4%) and in European cohorts (13.1%, 95% CI: 7.8-21.6%, P  < 0.001, I2 : 98.4%). COVID-19 patients with preexisting CAD had a two-fold risk of short-term mortality (OR 2.61, 95% CI 2.10-3.24, P  < 0.001, I2  = 73.6%); this risk was higher among Asian cohorts (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.79-3.90, P  < 0.001, I2 : 77.3%) compared with European (OR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.90-3.14, P  < 0.001, I2 : 56.9%) and American (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.41-2.44, P  < 0.001, I2 : 0%) populations. The association between CAD and poor short-term prognosis was influenced by age, prevalence of hypertension (HT), DM and CKD. CONCLUSIONS: Preexisting CAD is present in approximately 1 in 10 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and significantly associated with an increased risk of short-term mortality, which is influenced by age, HT, DM and CKD.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Hypertension , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2
13.
BMC Med Imaging ; 22(1): 114, 2022 06 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1951105

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is known as an important imaging indicator for cardiovascular risk stratification. The present study aimed to determine whether the EAT volume (EV) and mean EAT attenuation (mEA) measured by non-contrast routine chest CT (RCCT) could be more consistent with those measured by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) by adjusting the threshold of fatty attenuation. METHODS: In total, 83 subjects who simultaneously underwent CCTA and RCCT were enrolled. EV and mEA were quantified by CCTA using a threshold of (N30) (- 190 HU, - 30 HU) as a reference and measured by RCCT using thresholds of N30, N40 (- 190 HU, - 40 HU), and N45 (- 190 HU, - 45 HU). The correlation and agreement of EAT metrics between the two imaging modalities and differences between patients with coronary plaques (plaque ( +)) and without plaques (plaque ( -)) were analyzed. RESULTS: EV obtained from RCCT showed very strong correlation with the reference (r = 0.974, 0.976, 0.972 (N30, N40, N45), P < 0.001), whereas mEA showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.516, 0.500, 0.477 (N30, N40, N45), P < 0.001). Threshold adjustment was able to reduce the bias of EV, while increase the bias of mEA. Data obtained by CCTA and RCCT both demonstrated a significantly larger EV in the plaque ( +) group than in the plaque ( -) group (P < 0.05). A significant difference in mEA was shown only by RCCT using a threshold of N30 (plaque ( +) vs ( -): - 80.0 ± 4.4 HU vs - 78.0 ± 4.0 HU, P = 0.030). The mEA measured on RCCT using threshold of N40 and N45 showed no significant statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.092 and 0.075), which was consistent with the result obtained on CCTA (P = 0.204). CONCLUSION: Applying more negative threshold, the consistency of EV measurements between the two techniques improves and a consistent result can be obtained when comparing EF measurements between groups, although the bias of mEA increases. Threshold adjustment is necessary when measuring EF with non-contrast RCCT.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Adipose Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Pericardium/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
15.
J Thorac Imaging ; 37(4): 217-224, 2022 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1909064

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is regarded as a multisystemic disease. Patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease have an increased risk for a more severe disease course. This study aimed to investigate if a higher degree of coronary artery calcifications (CAC) on a standard chest computed tomography (CT) scan in mechanically ventilated patients was associated with a more severe multiorgan failure over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent a chest CT were prospectively included. CT was used to establish the extent of CAC using a semiquantitative grading system. We categorized patients into 3 sex-specific tertiles of CAC: lowest, intermediate, and highest CAC score. Daily, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were collected to evaluate organ failure over time. Linear mixed-effects regression was used to investigate differences in SOFA scores between tertiles. The models were adjusted for age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, cardiovascular risk factors, and chronic liver, lung, and renal disease. RESULTS: In all, 71 patients were included. Patients in the highest CAC tertile had, on average, over time, 1.8 (0.5-3.1) points higher SOFA score, compared with the lowest CAC tertile ( P =0.005). This association remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, and APACHE II score (1.4 [0.1-2.7], P =0.042) and clinically relevant after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors (1.3 [0.0-2.7], P =0.06) and chronic diseases (1.3 [-0.2 to 2.7], P =0.085). CONCLUSION: A greater extent of CAC is associated with a more severe multiorgan failure in mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , COVID-19/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Critical Care , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
16.
J Hypertens ; 40(7): 1278-1287, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1908998

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), cardiovascular risk factors and myocardial injury relate to increased mortality. We evaluated the extent of cardiac sequelae 6 months after hospital discharge in patients surviving ICU hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: All survivors of Maastricht-ICU were invited for comprehensive cardiovascular evaluation 6 months after discharge from ICU. Cardiac screening included an electrocardiogram, cardiac biomarkers, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and, wherever indicated, cardiac computed tomography or coronary angiogram. RESULTS: Out of 52 survivors, 81% ( n  = 42) participated to the cardiovascular follow-up [median follow-up of 6 months, interquartile range (IQR) 6.1-6.7]. Eight patients (19%) had newly diagnosed coronary artery disease (CAD), of which two required a percutaneous intervention. Echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) was abnormal in 24% and CMR-derived GLS was abnormal in 12%, despite normal left ventricular ejection fraction in all. None of the patients showed elevated T 1 relaxation times and five patients (14%) had an elevated T 2 relaxation time. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) reflecting regional myocardial fibrosis was increased in eight patients (21%), of which three had myocarditis and three had pericarditis. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular follow-up at 6 months after ICU-admission for severe COVID-19 revealed that one out of five invasively mechanically ventilated survivors had CAD, a quarter had subclinical left ventricular dysfunction defined as reduced echocardiographic GLS, and 42% of the patients had CMR abnormalities (reduced LVEF, reduced GLS, LGE presence, and elevated T 2 ). On the basis of these findings, long-term cardiovascular follow-up is strongly recommended in all post-IC COVID-19 patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial Register number [NL8613]) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8613Video abstract:http://links.lww.com/HJH/B899 .


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , COVID-19/complications , Contrast Media , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Gadolinium , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left
17.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 223: 106970, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1894890

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Incomplete Kawasaki disease (KD) has often been misdiagnosed due to a lack of the clinical manifestations of classic KD. However, it is associated with a markedly higher prevalence of coronary artery lesions. Identifying coronary artery lesions by echocardiography is important for the timely diagnosis of and favorable outcomes in KD. Moreover, similar to KD, coronavirus disease 2019, currently causing a worldwide pandemic, also manifests with fever; therefore, it is crucial at this moment that KD should be distinguished clearly among the febrile diseases in children. In this study, we aimed to validate a deep learning algorithm for classification of KD and other acute febrile diseases. METHODS: We obtained coronary artery images by echocardiography of children (n = 138 for KD; n = 65 for pneumonia). We trained six deep learning networks (VGG19, Xception, ResNet50, ResNext50, SE-ResNet50, and SE-ResNext50) using the collected data. RESULTS: SE-ResNext50 showed the best performance in terms of accuracy, specificity, and precision in the classification. SE-ResNext50 offered a precision of 81.12%, a sensitivity of 84.06%, and a specificity of 58.46%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggested that deep learning algorithms have similar performance to an experienced cardiologist in detecting coronary artery lesions to facilitate the diagnosis of KD.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Deep Learning , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome , Algorithms , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Child , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Echocardiography , Fever/complications , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/pathology , Humans , Infant , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/complications , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/diagnostic imaging
18.
Clin Imaging ; 89: 49-54, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1881791

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The potential effects of cardiovascular comorbidities on the clinical outcomes in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remain unclear. Identification of the coronary and non-coronary cardiovascular findings may help to stratify the patients' prognosis. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the coronary and the non-coronary cardiovascular findings in SARS-CoV-2 patients. METHODS: We studied a total of 594 SARS-CoV-2 patients who were hospitalized and performed a non-cardiac gated thoracic computed tomography. Two blinded radiologists assessed the coronary artery calcification segment involvement score (CACSIS) and non-coronary atherosclerosis cardiovascular findings (NCACVF). The baseline characteristics of the patients and CT findings were evaluated according to survival status. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 8 (4-12.5) days, 44 deaths occurred (7.4%). Compared to survivors, non-survivors had increased CACSIS [27.3% (CACSIS = 0) vs 25% (CACSIS 1-5) vs 47.7% (CACSIS >5), p < 0.001]. Similarly, on NCACVF, non-survivors had much more major findings compared to survivors (29.5% vs. 2.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, age (p = 0.009), creatinine (p < 0.001), hs-cTnI (p = 0.004) and NCACVF (HR 1.789; 95% CI 1.053-3.037; p = 0.031) maintained a significant independent association with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that coronary and non-coronary cardiovascular findings on non-cardiac gated thoracic CT may help to predict mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Calcinosis , Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
19.
Open Heart ; 9(1)2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1879141

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of performing exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline data were collected prospectively on 740 consecutive patients (mean age 61.4 years, 56.8% males), referred for a stress echocardiogram (SE), who underwent ESE between July 2020 (immediate post lockdown) and January 2021 according to national safety guidelines, in addition to patients wearing masks during ESE. Retrospective analysis was performed on follow-up data for outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare workload achieved during ESE pre-COVID-19, in 768 consecutive patients who underwent ESE between May 2014 and May 2015. Of the 725 (97.9%) diagnostic tests obtained, 69 (9.3%) demonstrated significant inducible ischaemia (≥3 segments) with no serious adverse events. Of the 61 patients who underwent coronary angiography, 51 (83%) demonstrated flow-limiting coronary artery disease. During a mean follow-up period of 4.6 months, one first-cardiac event was recorded.Compliance with mask-wearing throughout ESE was seen in 98.7% of patients. Of the 17 healthcare professionals performing ESE, none contracted COVID-19 during this period. SE service performance increased to 96.8% of prepandemic levels (100%) from 26.6% at the start of July 2020 to the end of December 2020.Propensity-matched data showed no significant difference in exercise workload between patients undergoing ESE during and prepandemic. CONCLUSION: Performing ESE during the COVID-19 pandemic, with safety measures in place, is feasible, efficacious and safe. It impacted on the time patients were waiting to undergo a diagnostic test and yielded appropriate outcomes.Service evaluation authorisation of research capability numberSE20/059.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Communicable Disease Control , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Echocardiography, Stress/methods , Exercise Test/methods , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies
20.
Acad Radiol ; 29(6): 861-870, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1704817

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess and correlate pulmonary involvement and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with the degree of coronary plaque burden based on the CAC-DRS classification (Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System). METHODS: This retrospective study included 142 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (58 ± 16 years; 57 women) who underwent non-contrast CT between January 2020 and August 2021 and were followed up for 129 ± 72 days. One experienced blinded radiologist analyzed CT series for the presence and extent of calcified plaque burden according to the visual and quantitative HU-based CAC-DRS Score. Pulmonary involvement was automatically evaluated with a dedicated software prototype by another two experienced radiologists and expressed as Opacity Score. RESULTS: CAC-DRS Scores derived from visual and quantitative image evaluation correlated well with the Opacity Score (r=0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.86, and r=0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.89, respectively; p<0.0001) with higher correlation in severe than in mild stage SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (p<0.0001). Combined, CAC-DRS and Opacity Scores revealed great potential to discriminate fatal outcomes from a mild course of disease (AUC 0.938, 95% CI 0.89-0.97), and the need for intensive care treatment (AUC 0.801, 95% CI 0.77-0.83). Visual and quantitative CAC-DRS Scores provided independent prognostic information on all-cause mortality (p=0.0016 and p<0.0001, respectively), both in univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary plaque burden is strongly correlated to pulmonary involvement, adverse outcome, and death due to respiratory failure in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, offering great potential to identify individuals at high risk.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Vascular Calcification , Calcium , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Lung , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL